Subaru Mirror Vibration Lawsuit: Do You Have a Claim?

Subaru owners are banding together to form a class and are bringing a class action lawsuit against Subaru for selling them vehicles containing a safety defect.

Specifically, the owners allege that their vehicle’s side mirrors shake and vibrate while the vehicle is being driven.

This class action lawsuit is still in its early stages, and more developments are likely to come. In this article, we go over this lawsuit and explain what is going on with it.

Then, we discuss the class action lawsuit process and how you might be able to join. Alternatively, the lemon law process might be a better way to go for your specific case. Continue reading to find out more.

Why Drivers Are Suing Over Shaking Side Mirrors

Side mirrors are one of the ways drivers are able to gather information about the road environment around them.

Without properly functioning side mirrors, drivers may not be able to see vehicles around them and therefore have reduced information to make safe driving decisions.

A vibrating or shaking mirror could also distort an image, making it difficult to tell how close or far away something is or what it is at all. Because of these safety problems, the Subaru owners decided to sue Subaru.

Which Subaru Models and Years Are Involved

For this class action lawsuit, 2024 Subaru CrossTrek and 2024 Subaru Ascent vehicles are impacted. These are the vehicles that have the shaking mirror issue, so they are the ones involved in the lawsuit.

What Drivers Are Experiencing

• Reddit Post

“To be honest, I thought it was because of the speakers, but yes, it is really annoying and distracting. The lawsuit is from a 2024 Crosstrek owner, which is what I own… shaking/loose side mirror and rearview mirror.”

• NHTSA Complaint

“Driver side exterior mirror has a vibration over 60 mph. The passenger side is fine. I reported to Subaru America at dealership but they will not acknowledge the defect. It makes it difficult to see while vibrating. No warning lights or anything are on. Yes, it is available for inspection.”

• NHTSA Complaint

“Problem with side mirrors. When driving past 55 mph, the mirrors begin to shake so much so that vision becomes blurry. Makes it difficult to merge safely. Both mirrors are impacted, but the driver side is significantly worse. I have had both mirrors and mirror assemblies replaced. However, the problem has not been resolved. Subaru tech said that this has been an issue for other models, but no fix has been made. Subaru tech drove car and confirmed the issue. Says there is nothing they can do to fix the issue.”

Has Subaru Issued a Recall or TSB for This Issue?

As of September 2025, Subaru has not issued a recall or a traffic safety bulletin for this mirror vibration problem.

That lack of response may have spurred on the lawsuit, since class members are seeking a remedy that will come free of charge if they win.

This is similar to how vehicle owners would be treated if there had been a recall, since recall remedies typically come at no cost to the consumer. It is possible Subaru will announce a recall for this issue in the future.

Avenues for Legal Action

Generally speaking, consumers have two routes they can go down for getting compensation when their vehicle is defective or causing them problems.

They can either join a class action lawsuit that is already ongoing, assuming they meet the criteria to join the class, or they can file their own individual lemon lawsuit against the vehicle’s manufacturer.

Both approaches have upsides and downsides, and consumers should choose whichever option works best for their facts and circumstances.

Join the Class Action

By consolidating many individual claims into a single case, a class action allows consumers to join together and hold a manufacturer accountable for widespread issues that may otherwise go unresolved.

This collective approach often makes it easier for consumers to pursue justice, particularly when the cost of filing a lawsuit individually would outweigh the potential recovery.

One of the primary benefits of joining a class action case is efficiency. Instead of each consumer fighting the manufacturer on their own, the claims are combined into a single proceeding.

This saves time, reduces litigation expenses, and increases the chances of a favorable outcome since the resources and evidence of many individuals are brought together.

For consumers who may lack the time or financial means to pursue a lawsuit independently, a class action provides a realistic path to obtaining relief.

Class actions can also result in meaningful compensation for affected vehicle owners. While individual payouts may sometimes be smaller than what a successful lemon law claim might achieve, class actions can still provide reimbursements for repairs, diminished value, or other financial losses.

In addition, they often push manufacturers to correct systemic problems, such as issuing recalls or redesigning defective components, which benefits all consumers on the road.

Beyond financial recovery, class actions give consumers a voice against powerful automakers. By joining forces, individuals can help expose industry-wide problems and hold companies accountable for failing to deliver safe and reliable vehicles.

This collective pressure not only helps those directly involved but also promotes higher standards of safety and transparency across the automotive industry.

Seek Individual Lemon Law Relief

For consumers dealing with a defective vehicle, pursuing an individual lemon law claim often provides a stronger and more direct path to relief than joining a class action lawsuit.

Lemon laws are specifically designed to protect car buyers who are stuck with persistent defects that affect the use, safety, or value of their vehicle.

Instead of being part of a large group case with uncertain outcomes, a lemon law claim allows the consumer to pursue their own remedy tailored to their unique situation.

One of the biggest advantages of a lemon law claim is the potential for a higher recovery. Unlike class actions, which often divide a settlement among thousands of claimants, lemon law cases focus solely on the individual vehicle owner.

This can result in significant compensation, such as a full refund of the purchase price, a replacement vehicle, or a cash settlement.

In addition, most lemon law statutes require the manufacturer to pay the consumer’s legal fees, making the process more accessible without out-of-pocket costs.

Another benefit is speed and control. Class actions can take years to resolve and often leave individual participants with little say in the process.

By contrast, lemon law claims usually move more quickly, especially when handled by an experienced attorney who knows how to navigate negotiations and, if necessary, litigation. Consumers also retain more control over their case and the outcome, rather than being bound by the decisions made on behalf of an entire class.

Ultimately, a lemon law claim provides a more personalized, efficient, and rewarding path for consumers struggling with defective vehicles.

By pursuing an individual claim, car owners can secure meaningful relief sooner and ensure that their rights are fully protected, rather than settling for the limited compensation of a large group action.

Work with Expert Attorneys Who Will Fight for You

If your vehicle has been in the shop repeatedly and the problems just won’t go away, waiting for a class action lawsuit to move forward might feel like a drag.

A lemon law claim can put you in control and help you secure a refund, replacement, or settlement directly from the manufacturer.

Get in touch with the Lemon Law Experts today to begin the claims process: our team of attorneys has helped consumers get significant compensation for purchasing defective vehicles.

Contact us today by calling (877) 885-5366 or by filling out a contact form on our website. However we hear from you, we hope to hear from you soon!