backup camera recall lincoln aviator

Ford Motor Company is now recalling over 100,000 Lincoln Aviator vehicles due to a software problem involving the 360 rearview camera.

The Lincoln Aviator 360 camera recall, announced on May 24, highlights a specific problem with the Accessory Protocol Image Module (APIM), which is susceptible to electromagnetic interference emanating from cellphones within the vehicle.

This interference can lead to the flickering or distortion of the rearview camera image, posing a potential risk of accidents.

Owners of 109,283 Lincoln Aviator vehicles spanning model years 2020 to 2024 are advised against using their cellphones while reversing until recall-related repairs are completed.

For drivers who have experienced recurrent backup camera issues, there may be eligibility for a lemon law claim, potentially resulting in a refund or cash compensation.

Affected Vehicle Average Lemon Law Settlement
2020 Lincoln Aviator $99,286
2021 Lincoln Aviator $113,549
2022 Lincoln Aviator $115,133
2023 Lincoln Aviator $117,730
2024 Lincoln Aviator $108,133

*Please keep in mind that the data displayed in the chart are approximations based on past case outcomes and should not be considered a prediction or guarantee. Each situation is unique and necessitates individualized legal advice.

    Having Vehicle Problems?

    Submit the form below to see if your vehicle qualifies for a lemon law claim.







    By submitting this form, you agree to receive emails, telephone calls, and text messages regarding your inquiry. Emails, text messages, and phone calls may be automatically generated using the information you provide. Your consent to this is not necessary to obtain legal services from our firm. Msg and Data Rates may apply.


    2024 Lincoln Aviator Backup Camera Recall: Affected Vehicles

    The Lincoln Aviator camera recall includes Lincoln Aviator SUVs manufactured between October 19, 2018, and April 25, 2024. The fundamental problem resides in the APIM, which may show the camera image flickering or incorrectly when subjected to electromagnetic interference from cellphones.

    When the cellphones are in use, have poor signal strength, and are kept in the console or cup holders, the connectivity problem is most noticeable. Lincoln notes more than 478 owner complaints about flickering and warped backup camera images.

    To find out if your vehicle is affected by this recall or any other ongoing recall, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) provides a recall check service on its website.

    If no recall appears upon entering your vehicle’s 17-digit VIN, it indicates the absence of any current recalls. Given the frequent issuance of recalls by automakers, we highly recommend checking if your vehicle is included in any open recalls, especially if you own a 2020 or newer vehicle.

    lincoln aviator backup camera recall information

    Is There a Fix for the Lincoln Aviator 360 Camera Recall?

    Yes, the manufacturer has authorized dealerships to add additional electromagnetic shielding to the APIM. To schedule recall-related repairs, vehicle owners can contact Lincoln at 866-436-7332, referencing NHTSA’s campaign number: 24V368. Lincoln’s designated recall number for this issue is 24S35.

    If your vehicle is affected by the 360 camera recall, you won’t incur any expenses for recall-related repairs. Lincoln dealerships will handle the entire process, from diagnosing the problem to implementing the fix, completely free of charge.

    Have there been other Lincoln Aviator backup camera recalls?

    Yes, this recall marks the latest in a series of recalls concerning the Aviator’s backup camera. We have written about past backup camera-related recalls involving the Lincoln Aviator here.

    Previously, Ford recalled over 382,000 newer Ford Explorer, Lincoln Corsair, and Lincoln Aviator SUV vehicles to address defective backup camera software. Many of these vehicles underwent a recall in 2021 for a similar software-related problem.

    Lincoln Aviator Backup Camera Blue Screen? Get Help from the Lemon Law Experts

    If you’re a Californian dealing with backup camera issues or other electrical system-related defects in a new or used vehicle, you might have a valid claim under the state’s lemon laws against Ford Motor Company. These laws provide avenues for eligible individuals to seek vehicle repurchase or replacement.

    Under the California Lemon Law, also known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, the manufacturer has the choice between repurchasing or replacing the vehicle, reimbursing all expenses associated with it, including down payments, monthly payments (inclusive of taxes and fees), and registration renewal.

    A lemon law repurchase, often termed as a refund is where the auto manufacturer refunds all monies spent on the vehicle including the down payment, monthly payments, taxes and fees minus a usage fee, which is a value assigned to when the vehicle was driven trouble-free.

    The usage fee is basically the value of the vehicle before the problem arose, calculated from the time of purchase until the first repair attempt for the issue deemed lemon-worthy.

    A lemon law replacement is where the lemon vehicle is swapped for one that is substantially similar.  Here, the consumer will be responsible for any usage fee and difference in price.

    When facing off against the powerful legal teams employed by auto manufacturers, going at it alone could leave you at a significant disadvantage. To level the playing field, you need the expertise and advocacy of the Lemon Law Experts at your side.

    The Lemon Law Experts have been champions for consumers against major auto manufacturers since 2009, securing millions in refunds and cash compensation for our clients.

    By working with us, you greatly increase your chances of becoming the prevailing party in litigation, ensuring the manufacturer covers reasonable attorney fees and costs.

    Our team offers legal representation on a contingency basis- offering the most advantageous option available. Contact our team at 877-885-5366 or fill out a form on our website to learn more today.

    Citations

    1.

    U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (2024, June 3). MDL Statistics Report – Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by District. Retrieved from https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_Actions_Pending-June-3-2024.pdf

    2.

    Cenziper, D. et al. (2024, January 29). Amid Recall Crisis, Philips Agrees To Stop Selling Sleep Apnea Machines in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/philips-agrees-to-stop-selling-sleep-apnea-machines-in-us

    3.

    Perrone, M. (2024, January 29). Maker of Recalled Sleep Apnea Machines Agrees to Halt Sales in US. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/sleep-apnea-machines-recall-philips-fda-safety-71686627ce41a8625a98449a61f63a0b

    See More
    CALL TEXT