Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Kia, Hyundai, and Genesis have announced a recall for 147,110 electric vehicles, as reported in documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) last week.

The Kia and Hyundai ICCU Recall addresses a concerning issue with the Integrated Charging Control Unit (ICCU), which may cease charging the 12-volt battery, potentially resulting in a loss of power to the wheels. This problem spans across various Hyundai and Kia EV models.

If your vehicle has been repeatedly repaired for Hyundai or Kia ICCU problems, you could qualify for a lemon law claim and get a refund or cash compensation.

Affected Vehicle	Average Lemon Law Settlement
2022-2024 Kia EV6	$88,078
2022-2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5	$83,952
2023-2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6	$83,562
2023-2024 Genesis GV60	$108,929
2023-2024 Genesis GV70 “Electrified”	$115,762
2023-2024 Genesis G80 “Electrified”	$134,925

*Please note, the figures presented in the chart are approximations based on past case results and should not be interpreted as a prediction or guarantee. Each case is unique and requires personalized legal guidance.

Hyundai is recalling 98,878 vehicles, affected models include the Hyundai Ioniq 5 spanning from 2022 to 2024, the Ioniq 6 from 2023 and 2024. Also affected are the Genesis GV60, Electrified GV70, and Electrified G80 from the 2023 and 2024 model years. Kia is recalling 48,232 units of its electric EV6 from the model years 2022 through 2024.

What is the Problem Involving the ICCU?

The core of the problem lies within the Integrated Charging Control Unit (ICCU), responsible for supplying power to low-voltage vehicle accessories and the 12-volt auxiliary battery, akin to the alternator in traditional gasoline-powered cars.

However, due to a manufacturing glitch, the ICCU may malfunction while the vehicle is in operation. This issue can be identified by a distinct “pop” noise. Subsequently, warning lights will illuminate on the dashboard, accompanied by audible alarms as the vehicle experiences power loss.

According to Hyundai’s provided documentation, drivers should have a window of 22 to 45 minutes to safely pull over before the vehicle completely loses power. Despite this power loss, critical safety systems such as airbags, brakes, and power steering will remain operational.

Presently, the NHTSA is conducting an ongoing investigation into reports of power loss specifically concerning 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 vehicles. Hyundai has acknowledged 618 unique incidents in the United States where vehicles experienced power loss while in motion, fortunately, none of which resulted in accidents or injuries.

Here’s What’s Included in the Hyundai and Kia ICCU Recall

The ICCU Recall includes the following vehicles:

• Hyundai Ioniq 5 (2022-2024)
• Kia EV6 (2022-2024)
• Hyundai Ioniq 6 (2023-2024)
• Genesis GV60 (2023-2024)
• Genesis GV70 Electrified SUV (2023-2024)
• Genesis GV80 Electrified Sedan (2023-2024)

For further assistance or to arrange recall repairs, owners can reach out to Hyundai and Genesis at 800-633-5151, and Kia at 800-333-4542. For Hyundai or Genesis customers, reference the NHTSA number 24V204 and Hyundai’s internal recall number 257/021G. For Kia vehicles, refer to the NHTSA number 24V200, and Kia’s internal recall number SC302.

Here’s What’s not Included in the Recall

NHTSA’s recall check website can tell you whether your vehicle has any open recalls that need to be addressed. If you plug your car’s 17-digit vehicle identification number (VIN) into NHTSA’s website and a recall doesn’t appear, it means your vehicle doesn’t currently have any open recalls. We recommend checking back regularly to see whether your vehicle has had a recall issued that needs immediate attention.

If you experience power loss problems in a Kia or Hyundai vehicle that isn’t part of this specific recall, you should still address the issue promptly for your safety and the safety of others on the road. Power loss while driving can lead to dangerous situations, including loss of control and potential accidents.

Please note that recalls are typically initiated for specific safety concerns identified by the manufacturer or regulatory agencies like the NHTSA. However, if you believe your vehicle’s power loss issue is due to a manufacturing defect or negligence on the part of the automaker, exploring legal options such as consulting with a lawyer specializing in consumer protection or lemon law may be necessary.

What is the fix for the Kia and Hyundai ICCU issue?

To address the ICCU concern, Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis dealerships will conduct a thorough software update and inspect the ICCU. Should the inspection reveal the need, they will proceed with replacing either the ICCU fuse or the entire unit. Notably, all repairs associated with this recall will be carried out at absolutely no cost to the owners, adhering to standard recall procedures.

The manufacturers have also agreed to potentially reimburse owners for any expenses incurred out-of-pocket in connection with rectifying the issue. Customers can anticipate receiving notification letters, with Hyundai and Genesis owners slated to be informed on May 14, while Kia owners will receive their notifications by April 29.

Hyundai or Kia Issues? Reach out to the Lemon Law Experts!

If your Kia vehicle is subject to the ICCU recall and you have experienced repeat repairs related to these issues, your Kia may be a lemon law and you may qualify for remedies under the California lemon law, including the possibility of receiving a refund, replacement vehicle or cash compensation.

As the prevailing party under the California lemon law, the defendant will pay your legal fees and costs, which makes pursuing a lemon law claim an easy decision to make as it will not cost you anything out of pocket. Taking prompt action is crucial, particularly in light of the potential safety risks associated with the ICCU recall.

As a leading lemon law firm in California, the Lemon Law Experts boast years of experience securing substantial compensation for consumers throughout the state.

Our dedicated team is committed to guiding you through every aspect of the legal process, whether it involves pursuing a claim against Kia or another vehicle manufacturer. And here’s the best part: we operate on a contingency basis, meaning we only collect payment if you win your case.

Do not wait any longer to seek the compensation and justice you deserve for your affected Kia or Hyundai vehicle. Contact the Lemon Law Experts to learn more about your options for resolution today.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Ford has recently announced a significant recall affecting over 450,000 vehicles. The Ford Bronco Power Loss Recall includes Ford Bronco Sport SUVs produced between 2020 and 2024, as well as Ford Maverick pickup trucks manufactured from 2021 to 2022.

The primary concern revolves around a potential loss of engine power during normal operation. If this issue occurs, drivers may face challenges in acceleration, which can increase the risk of an accident.

Beyond the loss of motive power, affected vehicles may also experience electrical accessory failure. Important features like hazard lights or other 12-volt accessories may malfunction, further compromising safety.

Recall Information	Details
Total Vehicles Recalled	456,565 vehicles
Affected Makes/Models/Model Years	2021-2024 Ford Bronco Sport, 2022-2023 Ford Maverick
Description of Noncompliance	Inadequate calibration to detect abrupt battery deterioration during driving cycles can result in two potential outcomes: (a) the vehicle may fail to restart after an auto start/stop event, or (b) it may stall while decelerating at low speeds. Either scenario could entail a loss of 12-volt accessories, such as hazard lights.
Ford Motor Company Contact Number	1-866-436-7332
NHTSA Recall Number	24V-267
Manufacturer Recall Number	24S24
Owner Notification Letters	May 13, 2024

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has documented 917 warranty claims related to this issue. According to their findings, the body and powertrain control modules in these vehicles may not effectively recognize shifts in the battery’s state of charge, resulting in potential loss of motive power.

To address this safety concern, Ford dealerships will undertake recalibrations of these systems at no cost to owners. If you own one of the affected vehicles, be sure to contact your local Ford dealership promptly to schedule the necessary service.

Here’s What’s Included in the 2024 Ford Maverick and Bronco Sport Recall

The recall includes specific models of Ford Bronco Sport SUVs and Maverick pickup trucks manufactured within distinct timeframes:

• Ford Bronco Sport (2021-2024) SUVs produced between February 5, 2020, and March 13, 2024
• Ford Maverick (2022-2023) pickup trucks manufactured between February 3, 2021, and October 28, 2022

As a fix, Ford dealerships will recalibrate the Body Control Module (BCM) and Powertrain Control Module (PCM), ensuring proper functionality and mitigating the risk of power loss incidents. Drivers are encouraged to reach out to Ford directly at 866-436-7332 for further assistance. When contacting Ford, reference recall number 24V267, or internally known as recall 24S24.

Here’s What’s NOT Included in the 2024 Ford Bronco Sport and Maverick Recall

This recall affects certain Ford Bronco Sport (2021-2024) and Ford Maverick (2022-2023) vehicles. If you are not sure whether your vehicle is affected, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) website provides a convenient tool. By inputting your car’s 17-digit Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), you can ascertain if any open recalls pertain to your vehicle. If no recall appears, it indicates your vehicle currently does not have any open recalls.

We recommend reviewing the NHTSA’s recall check website to check for any newly issued recalls pertaining to your vehicle.

How do you fix the Ford Maverick and Bronco Power Loss problem?

The fix for the Ford Bronco Power Loss problem involves an engine control software update aimed at identifying pressure drops within the fuel injection system. Upon detecting such an occurrence, the software will take preventive measures, including disabling the high-pressure fuel pump, reducing engine power, and lowering temperatures in the engine compartment. Affected owners will receive a prompt message advising them to seek service.

What should I do if my Ford Bronco Sport or Maverick was Recalled?

If your Ford Bronco Sport or Maverick are included in this recall, we recommend acting as quickly as possible. For further assistance or questions regarding the recall process, you can reach out to Ford directly at 866-436-7332, referencing the designated recall number, 24S06.

While recalls aim to address specific safety or performance concerns, they may not necessarily resolve all underlying issues that could impact the vehicle’s long-term reliability or safety. Therefore, we highly recommend reviewing the vehicle’s condition and functionality even after the necessary repairs have been completed.

If you are facing persistent issues with your Ford Bronco Sport, Maverick, or other vehicle, we recommend seeking guidance from a consumer protection or lemon law attorney. These legal experts can analyze the vehicle’s history, including past repairs, recalls, and recurring issues, to determine if it meets the criteria for classification as a “lemon” under applicable state lemon laws.

If your vehicle is a lemon, you could stand to receive far more in compensation than simply covering or refunding you for recall-related repairs. A successful lemon law claim can conclude with cash compensation, a new vehicle, or a lemon law refund covering all expenses incurred on your lemon, including legal fees.

Contact the Ford California Lemon Law Experts Today

Vehicle recalls have become increasingly common in recent years. Modern vehicles are built with incredibly interconnected systems and a single manufacturing error can cause a range of vehicle issues. The manufacturing error involved in the 2024 Ford Bronco Sport Power Loss recall for instance can potentially affect various vehicle systems, including the electrical, transmission, and engine systems.

Manufacturing errors can thus lead to more serious issues than in years past, as a result, modern recall-related issues can often offer consumers with problematic vehicles an opportunity to recover compensation through an individual lemon law claim. If you are dealing with a defective vehicle due to the Ford Bronco Sport Power Loss Recall in California, the Lemon Law Experts may be able to assist you.

Our team at the Lemon Law Experts specializes in representing consumers in lemon law cases across the state. As one of the state’s leading lemon law and consumer protection firm, we have assisted thousands of consumers in recovering millions of dollars in compensation for their lemon vehicles.

If you suspect that your Ford Bronco Sport qualifies as a lemon due to repeat issues from the recall or something else, our team can evaluate your case at no cost, helping you take the first step toward resolving your case against Ford. If you have any questions about your situation, do not hesitate to contact the Lemon Law Experts today.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

This GM Lifter Class Action Lawsuit remains open, and Californians interested in joining can still do so. The complaint alleges that consumers, including Plaintiffs, unknowingly purchased vehicles afflicted with latent defects in their engines’ valve train systems.

These defects, particularly affecting the lifters involved in Active Fuel Management (“AFM”), can lead to various engine malfunctions, including collapsed or stuck lifters, valve malfunction, pushrod bending, camshaft damage, and further engine component harm.

Following briefing on a motion to dismiss and a motion to compel arbitration, on January 19, 2023, the Court issued opinions and orders, allowing many of Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s claims to proceed. Presently, the parties are engaged in the discovery process, and litigation continues.

Class Action Deadline	Class Action Counsel	Class Action Details
TBA	Capstone Law APC	Owners or lessees of specified 2014-2021 Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, and GMC vehicles equipped with 5.3L, 6.0L or 6.2L V8 engines are eligible.

Which GM Owners Are Eligible to Join

Owners or lessees of the following GM vehicles, referred to as Class Vehicles, are eligible to join the lawsuit:

• Cadillac Escalade (2014-present)
• Cadillac CTS-V (2016-2019)
• Chevrolet Silverado (2014-present)
• Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (2014-present)
• Certain Chevrolet Corvette models (2014-2019)
• Chevrolet Avalanche (2014-2016)
• Chevrolet Suburban (2014-present)
• Chevrolet Tahoe (2014-present)
• Chevrolet Camaro (2016-present)
• Chevrolet Camaro SS (2014-present)
• Chevrolet Corvette (2014-2016)
• GMC Sierra 1500 (2014-present)
• GMC Sierra 1500 (2014-present)
• GMC Yukon
• GMC Yukon XL (2014-present)

The problem might cause other valve train system components, such as the valve lifter oil manifold (“VLOM”), valve springs, and rocker arms, to fail prematurely. The defect’s symptoms include engine noises such as chirping, squealing, squeaking, or ticking, as well as engine misfires, which frequently result in Diagnostic Trouble Codes P0300-P0308.

These faults can cause decreased power when driving, hesitation, rough running, and, in more serious situations, smoke from the tailpipe and engine failure. According to the lawsuit, General Motors concealed these problems from consumers.

Four Steps to Join the GM Lifter Class Action Lawsuit

If you own or have owned one of the affected vehicles and wish to participate in the class action lawsuit against GM to potentially receive a settlement check, here are the steps you can take:

1. Contact Legal Representation: Reach out to the legal team representing the plaintiffs in this lawsuit. You can contact Berger Montague or their co-counsel to express your interest in joining the case.
2. Provide Documentation: Be prepared to provide documentation proving your ownership or lease of one of the Class Vehicles during the specified time period (2014-2021). This may include purchase or lease agreements, vehicle registration, or other relevant documentation.
3. Participate in the Legal Process: Once you have contacted legal representation and provided necessary documentation, follow their guidance on how to proceed. This may involve completing forms, providing additional information, or participating in legal proceedings as required.
4. Stay Informed: Keep in touch with your legal representation to stay updated on the progress of the lawsuit and any developments regarding potential settlements or payouts.

Pros and Cons of Joining this Class Action

Pros

Here are some potential pros of joining the GM Lifter Class Action lawsuit:

• Potential Compensation: By joining the class action lawsuit, you may be eligible to receive compensation if the lawsuit is successful. This compensation could help cover any financial losses or damages incurred due to the alleged defects in the Class Vehicles.
• Shared Legal Costs: In a class action lawsuit, legal costs are typically shared among all members of the class. This means that you won’t have to bear the full burden of legal expenses on your own.

Cons

The following are some possible cons when joining a class action:

• Uncertainty of Outcome: There’s no guarantee of success in a class action lawsuit. Even if the case is settled or ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, individual payouts may vary, and it’s possible that the compensation received may not fully cover your losses.
• Loss of Control: When you join a class action lawsuit, you relinquish some control over the legal process. Decisions regarding settlement negotiations, legal strategy, and other aspects of the case are typically made by the appointed class representatives and legal counsel.
• Time-consuming Process: Class action lawsuits can be lengthy and drawn-out affairs. It may take months or even years for the case to reach a resolution, during which time you may not see any compensation.
• Opting Out of the Class: In some cases, joining the class action lawsuit may require you to waive your right to pursue individual legal action against the defendant in the future. If you believe you may have stronger grounds for a separate lawsuit or wish to retain control over your legal options, joining the class may not be the best course of action.

You should carefully weigh these pros and cons and consider your individual circumstances before deciding whether to join the class action lawsuit. Getting help from a qualified consumer protection or lemon law attorney can also help you make an informed decision.

Why Pursuing a Lemon Law Claim Can Be a Better Financial Option

When considering avenues for addressing issues with defective vehicles, pursuing a lemon law claim often emerges as a financially advantageous option.

Lemon law claims operate on an individualized basis, offering the potential for higher compensation tailored to the specific losses incurred by each consumer. Unlike class action settlements where payouts are typically distributed evenly among class members, lemon law claims may result in full reimbursement of the purchase price or a replacement vehicle, providing a more substantial financial recovery.

Moreover, lemon law claims often follow an expedited legal process, allowing for quicker resolution compared to the potentially protracted proceedings of class action lawsuits. By bypassing delays inherent in collective litigation, individuals can promptly address concerns related to defective vehicles and secure compensation or replacement vehicles in a timelier manner.

Pursuing a lemon law claim can also afford you greater control and personalized attention throughout the legal process. Working closely with legal counsel, individuals can receive tailored representation that advocates for their specific circumstances and needs.

This individualized approach ensures that consumers’ concerns are addressed comprehensively and that they receive the full extent of compensation to which they are entitled under lemon law provisions.

You may receive around a $1,000 or even less through a class action settlement, whereas through an individual claim, you could qualify for far more in the form of cash compensation, a replacement vehicle, or a full refund of all the money you have spent on your defective vehicle, which includes your legal fees.

GM Lifter Class Action Lawsuit Deadlines

As of now, the case regarding the GM Lifter Class Action Lawsuit is currently pending. Specific deadlines related to the lawsuit, such as deadlines for filing claims, opting out of the class, or other legal proceedings, have not yet been established. As the case progresses through the legal system, deadlines may be set by the court or agreed upon by the parties involved.

It is essential for individuals who may be affected by the lawsuit to stay informed about any updates or developments regarding deadlines and legal proceedings.

This can be done by keeping in touch with legal representation, monitoring court filings and updates, or seeking information from reliable sources. As the case progresses and deadlines are established, affected individuals will have the opportunity to take necessary actions to protect their rights and potentially participate in the lawsuit to seek compensation or other remedies.

Contact a California Lemon Law Attorney

Seeking the assistance of a consumer protection or lemon law attorney can often lead to more substantial compensation than settling through a class action lawsuit.

If your case qualifies, you may be entitled to cash compensation, a replacement vehicle, or a full lemon law refund covering reimbursing all monies you spent on the vehicle (minus a usage fee) related to your defective vehicle.  As the prevailing party under the California Lemon Law, the defendant is also responsible to pay the consumer’s legal fees and costs, which makes pursuing a lemon law claim the right and easy decision.

At the Lemon Law Experts, we specialize in advocating for consumers affected by the GM lifter defect. Our mission is to secure fair compensation for those who have suffered harm from purchasing or leasing a defective vehicle.

With a commitment to responsiveness and personalized attention, our firm ensures that your needs are prioritized throughout the legal process. Expect regular updates, timely responses to inquiries, and unwavering support to keep you informed and confident in pursuing your claim.

Whether you are considering joining the GM class action lawsuit or pursuing individual legal action, contact us today for a complimentary, no-obligation assessment of your situation. Our team is dedicated to fighting for your rights and achieving the best possible outcome for your case. Contact our team at the Lemon Law Experts today to learn more.

2022-2024 Nissan CVT Class Action Settlement

A recent class action settlement has been reached between Nissan North America and consumers with several Nissan models that are equipped with defective continuously variable transmissions (CVTs).

The most recent lawsuit alleged that the Japanese automaker knowingly sold vehicles with defective CVT transmissions. Nissan agreed to pay over $277 million as part of the settlement to resolve certain defective transmissions claims. The following Nissan models are included in the 2022 Nissan CVT settlement:

• 2014 – 2018 Nissan Rogue
• 2015 – 2018 Nissan Pathfinder
• 2015 – 2018 Infiniti QX60

This latest Nissan class-action lawsuit to settle alleges that several vehicles were equipped with defective transmissions and that the automaker knew about the CVT problem for years. Several drivers say that transmission and other lemon issues began appearing in their vehicles in as little 20,000 miles.

In 2020, three separate class-action lawsuits were settled with Nissan North America. The bases for these lawsuits were similar claims, i.e., that the manufacturer knowingly sold vehicles with defective CVT transmission systems.

Class action settlements were reached in all three prior lawsuits, which covered the following Nissan models:

• 2012 – 2017 Nissan Versa
• 2014 – 2017 Nissan Versa Note
• 2013 – 2017 Nissan Sentra
• 2013 – 2016 Nissan Altima
• 2013 – 2017 Nissan Juke

Approxiamte Nissan CVT Transmission Settlement You Could Receive

Potentially Affected Vehicle	Average Lemon Law Settlement
2018-2024 Nissan Versa	$29,550
2018-2024 Nissan Kicks	$36,844
2018-2024 Nissan Sentra	$37,355
2018-2024 Nissan Altima	$51,229
2018-2024 Nissan Rogue	$53,075
2018-2024 Nissan Murano	$68,275
2018-2024 Nissan Pathfinder	$68,690
2018-2023 Nissan Maxima	$69,383
2018-2024 Infiniti Qx60	$89,284

*Please note, the figures presented in the chart are approximations based on past case results and should not be interpreted as a prediction or guarantee. Each case is unique and requires personalized legal guidance.

Nissan CVT Problems

If you own or lease a Nissan and have experienced issues involving its transmission system, the manufacturer may have sold you a lemon. Nissan’s problematic CVT has been a top lemon law complaint for years involving a wide range of Nissan models.

In comparison to other transmissions, continuously variable transmissions are apparently prone to overheating and premature wear. It is also both difficult and costly to repair a CVT. Transmission rebuilds can be costly, running anywhere from $3,500 to $8,000 or more.

Common issues involving Nissan CVT transmissions include:

Nissan Frequently Asked Questions – FAQs:

Does my Nissan Have a CVT Transmission?

Your vehicle’s transmission type can be found in the owner’s manual. If you do not have the manual, you may also open your driver’s side door where you can find a white card on the side that has information about the year your vehicle was made, its engine details, transmission and other items.

Is it Too Late to Begin a Nissan Lemon Case?

If you timely opted out of a class action settlement and you have experienced repeat repairs with your Nissan during the warranty period, you may qualify for a lemon law claim.

Our team of Lemon Law Experts may be able to assist you if you timely opted out of any relevant Nissan class action settlement opt out deadline specific to your year and model.

Should I Pursue a Lemon Law Case or a Class Action Settlement?

We suggest that you timely opt out of any class action settlement deadline and pursue an individual lemon law case instead. In class action settlements, a set amount of money is split among everyone who did not opt out, which can be tens of thousands of affected Nissan owners and lessees.

Is my Nissan Rogue, Nissan Pathfinder, or Infiniti QX60 a Lemon?

Your Nissan Rogue, Nissan Pathfinder, or Infiniti QX60 may be a lemon if you have taken it in for repeat repair during the manufacturer limited or powertrain warranty. The best way to find out if your Nissan or Infiniti is a lemon is to contact a lemon law attorney as soon as possible for a case evaluation.

Nissan Lemon Law Solutions

If you are included in one or more class action settlements, we suggest that you opt out before the associated deadline and hold on to your right to file an individual lemon law claim.

If you are not sure how to opt out or if you do not know if your vehicle is affected, the Lemon Law Experts can help you. Instead of splitting a settlement amongst thousands of people, we recommend that you pursue an individual lemon law claim.

If an auto manufacturer agrees to repurchase your vehicle, they are required to reimburse the:

• Down payment
• Monthly payments made (minus a usage fee)
• Rental car fees
• Towing fees
• Auto loan balance
• Attorney fees/costs

Contact us to see if you qualify. You could be eligible to receive a refund or replacement vehicle, or cash compensation.

If you own or lease a Nissan with transmission problems or another vehicle you have questions about, let us know. As California’s premier lemon law firm, the Lemon Law Experts have helped consumers across the state of California recover millions for their lemon vehicles. Act today! You can reach us by either phone or email.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Mercedes-Benz has announced a recall affecting nearly 32,000 vehicles, citing concerns over a flawed 80-amp fuse. This defect has the potential to trigger various electrical malfunctions, ranging from power loss while driving to malfunctioning screens and safety systems. Additionally, there’s an elevated risk of fire due to this issue. The root cause lies in the improper manufacturing of the fuse.

The faulty 80-amp fuse, failing to meet production standards, poses a significant safety risk as it can disrupt crucial vehicle systems. These disruptions could lead to accidents, fires, or injuries.

Despite the seriousness of the problem, the automaker asserts that there have been no reported warranty claims, customer complaints, or injuries stemming from this issue in the United States, as per documents submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Recall Information	Details
Total Vehicles Recalled	31,848 potentially involved vehicles
Description of Noncompliance	Certain 80A fuses which were installed might not meet production requirements. As a result, a contact interruption or an increased triggering resistance might occur. In this case, systems connected to the fuse might become inoperable. The vehicle might also lose propulsion without warning, and restraint functions or the instrument cluster might be impaired, which could increase the risk of a crash or injuries.
Ford Motor Company Contact Number	1-877-496-3691
NHTSA Recall Number	24V-115
Manufacturer Recall Number	N/A
Owner Notification Letters	Commencing April 16, 2024

Mercedes-Benz initiated an investigation into this issue in September 2023, prompted by reports of non-starting vehicles at assembly plants rather than incidents on the road. Presently Mercedes-Benz AG has not confirmed any field reports, service records, or warranty claims pertaining to the United States.

Here’s What’s Included in the 2024 Mercedes 80 Amp Fuse Recall

The 80 Amp recall includes Mercedes Benz vehicles from 2023-2024 spanning a range of models including the:

• C300,
• AMG C43,
• S580e, S580,
• Maybach S580,
• Maybach S680,
• AMG SL43,
• AMG SL63,
• GLC300,
• EQE350,
• EQE500,
• EQS450,
• EQS580,
• AMG EQS,
• 2023 S500,
• AMG SL55,
• AMG EQE,
• 2024 E350,
• E450,
• AMG C63e S,
• CLE300 Coupe,
• CLE450 Coupe, and
• GLC300 Coupe.

The supplier addressed the issue in November 2023. Mercedes-Benz responded by implementing eight distinct part numbers for the fuse boxes installed in the affected vehicles, as a measure to rectify the situation. These part numbers are as follows:

• A2545402126,
• A2065407464,
• A2235403856,
• A2235403756,
• A2235403956,
• A2975407830,
• A2975408030, and,
• A2975407930.

Here’s What’s NOT Included in the 2024 Mercedes 80 Amp Fuse Recall

Affected vehicles were assembled from February 6, 2023, to November 10, 2023. Mercedes-Benz vehicles produced outside this specified period are not subject to this recall, but they could encounter similar vehicle issues.

To find out whether your vehicle is subject to any open recalls, you can visit the NHTSA’s recall check website. By inputting your car’s 17-digit VIN into the NHTSA’s database, you can determine if there are any outstanding recalls.

If no recall appears, this indicates that your vehicle currently does not have any open recalls. Considering that automakers frequently issue recalls, even for older vehicles, you should check periodically to ensure your vehicle hasn’t been affected by a recent recall.

What should I do if my Mercedes Benz vehicle is included in this recall?

If your Mercedes-Benz vehicle is affected by the 80 Amp fuse recall, you should schedule your recall repairs promptly. Failure to address this issue could result in unexpected loss of propulsion, compromised restraint functions, or impaired instrument cluster functionality, potentially heightening the risk of accidents or injuries. According to Mercedes Benz, there is also an increased risk of vehicle fire in affected units.

Authorized Mercedes-Benz dealers will replace the main fuse box(es) in the affected vehicles to rectify the problem. The flawed fuses, manufactured incorrectly, may lead to interruptions in contact or increased triggering resistance, rendering systems connected to the 80A fuse inoperative. Please note that Mercedes Benz’s number associated with the recall has not been reported, NHTSA’s recall number is 24V-115.

Recurring Issues in Your Mercedes-Benz? Call the Experts!

If you have encountered recurring issues with your Mercedes-Benz vehicle related to the amp fuse recall, you may qualify for more than just standard recall repairs.

Depending on your circumstances, you could qualify under the California Lemon Law and be entitled to compensation.  If your vehicle is a lemon, you may be entitled to a refund, replacement vehicle or cash compensation under the California Lemon Law.

As the prevailing party, the California Lemon Law also requires that the defendant pay for your reasonable attorneys fees and costs.  This makes pursuing a lemon law claim the right and easy decision since there are no out of pocket costs for the consumer.

For California consumers who purchased or leased a lemon Mercedes-Benz vehicle, the Lemon Law Experts can assist you. With a wealth of experience in handling lemon law cases throughout the state since 2009, our dedicated team possesses the knowledge and capabilities to advocate effectively for your rights.

Regardless of the manufacturer or the specific issue at hand, you can rely on our team at the Lemon Law Experts to offer comprehensive support in pursuing the compensation and resolution you deserve. Contact us to learn more about your options for lemon law recovery today.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Toyota has issued a recall affecting approximately 381,000 Toyota Tacoma pickup trucks due to a potential rear axle issue. This recall has been initiated in response to concerns regarding welding debris on the rear axle, which could lead to the loosening of retaining nuts, according to information provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Drivers of affected vehicles may notice unusual symptoms such as vibrations, abnormal noises, or leakage of gear oil from the rear axle housing.

If left unaddressed, this issue could potentially cause the axle shafts to separate, which not only compromises the stability of the vehicle but also impacts the effectiveness of the brakes, thereby elevating the risk of an accident.

Recall Information	Details
Total Vehicles Recalled	381,199 potentially involved vehicles
Vehicle Type	2022-2023 Toyota Tacoma
Description of Noncompliance	The rear axle assembly of the vehicles in question is made up by axle shaft sub-assemblies that are fastened to the welded-on axle housing ends on both sides of the assembly. Studs and retaining nuts secure each axle shaft subassembly to the axle housing. Due to an inappropriate welding spatter guard mounting setup at a supplier’s manufacturing site, welding spatter could have landed on the retaining nut seating surface. In this circumstance, joint retention may be compromised; the retaining nuts may loosen over time and break off, leading either of the axle shaft subassemblies to begin to separate from the axle housing.
Toyota Contact Number	1-800-331-4331
NHTSA Recall Number	24V-152
Manufacturer Recall Number	24TB05 / 24TA05
Owner Notification Letters	April 27, 2024

Here’s What’s Included in the Tacoma Rear Axle Recall

The Toyota Rear Axle recall includes 2022-2023 Toyota Tacoma pickup trucks. Toyota dealerships will conduct inspections on the rear axle assembly and re-tighten axle retaining nuts at no cost to the owners.

The extent of the affected trucks remains somewhat uncertain. Please note that in some of these Tacoma pickup trucks, metal may have splattered onto regions where bolts require tightening. Affected drivers will receive notification via mail in April of this year.

Here’s What’s NOT Included in the Tacoma Rear Axle Recall

The automaker has determined that the recall population consists of 2022-2023 Toyota Tacoma vehicles only. To find out if your vehicle is part of this recall or any others, simply visit Toyota.com/recall or nhtsa.gov/recalls and input your Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) or license plate details.

For further inquiries, Toyota’s customer support team is available via the Toyota Brand Engagement Center at (800) 331-4331. Additionally, owners can also reach out to NHTSA’s safety hotline at (888) 327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153). The NHTSA’s recall notice is identified as No. 24V15200.

What should I do if my Toyota Tacoma was recalled?

If your Toyota pickup has been recalled due to Rear Axle concerns or any other issue, you should promptly reach out to Toyota to schedule repairs. Remember, under federal law, automakers are obligated to cover the expenses associated with recall repairs.

Your circumstances might warrant consideration under lemon laws if you have dealt with recurrent vehicle problems. These laws provide recourse for consumers dealing with persistent issues, potentially entitling you to a replacement vehicle, monetary compensation, or a full refund of all expenses linked to your vehicle.

In certain cases, pursuing legal action against Toyota could yield more advantageous outcomes than simply addressing the repairs. If you believe you may be eligible for relief under lemon laws, consulting with a qualified attorney specializing in consumer rights can provide you with guidance tailored to your situation.

Defective Toyota? Give the Lemon Law Experts a Call!

Vehicle recalls have become increasingly prevalent in recent times, and cars in Toyota’s lineup are no exception. Toyota recently recalled 280,000 trucks and SUVs for a separate issue that caused trucks to “creep” forward when shifted into neutral. The vehicles affected by this recall included Toyota’s large Tundra pickup, Sequoia, and Lexus LX 600 large SUVs.

If you suspect that you may have grounds for a lemon law case against Toyota, we recommend exploring avenues for potential recovery. Depending on the circumstances, you could be entitled to compensation, which may include either a refund, replacement vehicle, or cash compensation.

Also, as the prevailing party with a lemon law claim against Toyota, Toyota is responsible to pay for your attorneys fees and costs.  Thus, with a lemon law claim, there is no out of pocket expense for the consumer.

If you purchased or leased your vehicle in California, the Lemon Law Experts might be able to assist you. With extensive experience in handling lemon law cases throughout the state, our dedicated team possesses the knowledge and capabilities needed to effectively advocate for you in your case.

We have been successfully handling consumer lemon law claims since 2009 and we have helped California consumers recover millions in refunds and cash compensation.  Call Lemon Law Experts today. We offer comprehensive assistance in pursuing the compensation and resolution you deserve. Contact our team today to learn more.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

2022 Chevy Bolt Class Action Lawsuit

A 2022 class action lawsuit is accusing General Motors of selling 2020-2022 model year Chevy Bolt EV and 2022 Chevy Bolt EUV vehicles that are unsafe and likely to catch on fire.

Allegedly, the batteries in these cars are not fit for normal use because they become fire-prone when the cars are fully charged or go below 70 miles of remaining charge. About a month after the sole plaintiff leased his new 2022 Chevy Bolt, GM recalled the vehicle following reports of cars catching on fire.

Over three recalls, GM has instructed drivers to limit the battery charge to 90 percent, not let the remaining range drop below 70 miles, supervise the vehicle while it is charging, and to not park the vehicle close to fire hazards.

According to the suit, GM’s “warning that consumers should not charge the Vehicles past 90% drops the advertised mileage capacity from 259 to 233.10 miles.

Taking into consideration that consumers cannot allow the miles remaining on the Vehicle to fall below 70 miles, the battery range falls further to 163.10 miles – that is, 62.97% of the advertised mileage.”

The plaintiff says that he would not have leased a Chevy Bolt had he known about its limited use and safety risks. This recent 2022 class action suit is the latest in a string of lawsuits filed against GM over issues with Chevy Bolt EV and EUV batteries.

A similar suit was filed on behalf of 30 plaintiffs in Michigan in December of 2021. Two other suits regarding fire-prone lithium batteries were filed in 2020.

Approximate Compensation You Could Get for Your Chevy Bolt

Affected Vehicle	Average Lemon Law Settlement
2022-2023 Chevrolet Bolt EUV	$57,575
2020-2023 Chevrolet Bolt EV	$60,865

*Please note, the figures presented in the chart are approximations based on past case results and should not be interpreted as a prediction or guarantee. Each case is unique and requires personalized legal guidance.

Chevy Bolt EV and EUV

GM hailed the Bolt as Chevrolet’s first extended-range electric car throughout its release in 2017. Consumers were excited with its mileage, design, and accessible price point. And the sales reflected that. That year, the Bolt became the top-selling plug-in model in California and the second best-selling plug-in car in the United States.

The 2022 Chevrolet Bolt EV debuted on February 14^th, 2021, and quickly entered production that summer. The latest model boasts 259 miles of charge, seating for up to five passengers, and 200 horsepower. The 2022 Bolt EV received substantial redesign to its front clip, rear, and parts of its interior. Otherwise, the dimensions of the vehicle, and presumably its engine, remain relatively unchanged.

Alongside the 2022 Bolt EV model, GM unveiled its battery electric vehicle (BEV), the Bolt EUV (electric utility vehicle), as an expansion of the Bolt lineup. The EUV is part of GM’s effort to release 30 new EV vehicle offerings by the year 2025.

In the wake of declining sales and overwhelming battery problems, the automaker should perhaps focus on making innovations to cars in its current EV lineup. Chevy Bolt EV and Chevy Bolt EUV are now covered by 8-year, 100,000-mile warranties following major recalls of both vehicles in recent years.

Chevy Bolt Recall: A History of Fires

GM issued its first recall of the Chevy Bolt in November 2020. At that time, the recall included over 50,000 2017-2018 and certain 2019 Chevy Bolt EV vehicles. The reason for this recall was that the high voltage battery is at risk of catching on fire when the vehicle is charged to full or near full capacity.

At that time, GM knew of 5 cars that had caught on fire. GM told consumers to reprogram the hybrid propulsion control module and keep their cars charged at 90 percent. They warned owners to park their vehicles outside until the software update was completed.

GM announced a second recall on July 23, 2021. This affected nearly 69,000 2017-2019 Chevy Bolt EV cars. This recall included vehicles that were previously recalled, because again, the Chevy Bolt lithium-ion battery is fire-prone when at full or near full charge. At this time, GM determined that 10 car fires were the result of faulty batteries.

The auto company replaced the battery modules free of charge and advised drivers to once again reprogram their vehicles, avoid depleting the battery range to 70 miles or below, to park outside after charging, and to avoid charging the vehicles overnight or indoors.

On October 18, 2021, General Motors expanded the Chevy Bolt recall to all 2017-2022 Chevrolet Bolt EV and 2022 Bolt EUV cars, totaling the number of recalled Bolt vehicles to about 141,000. The auto company identified at least 3 injuries and 13 fires linked to two defects in the batteries. GM claimed that the risk of fire is “rare” because two defects must both be present in the battery module for the vehicle to catch fire: a torn tab and a folded separator.

Included in the recall fix is a software update that will allegedly monitor batteries for any issues. Additionally, GM advised owners and lessees of 2017-2018 Chevy Bolts that have not been repaired yet, to keep their battery charge at 90% using Hilltop Reserve mode. Those who own or lease 2018-2022 Chevy Bolt cars were told to use Target Charge Level mode.

GM also repeated past recommendations to drivers about limiting the car’s charge, parking vehicles outside after charging, among others. The auto company went so far as to advise owners and lessees to park their vehicles at least 50 feet from others.

The Chevy Bolt recall will cost an estimated $2 billion; however, GM will be able to recoup about $1.9 billion due to an agreement with LG Electronics. Despite this immense recall of all Chevy Bolt vehicles, the automaker has yet to issue a final remedy.

They claim they are currently investigating the issue, as many Chevy Bolt owners are having trouble receiving replacement parts and software updates from Chevrolet dealers in a timely manner. Others find themselves disappointed and discouraged from the new charging instructions from GM, which profoundly impact their Bolt’s mileage and use.

Chevy Bolt Consumer Concerns

There are numerous complaints regarding battery problems in Chevy Bolt vehicles. Many owners and lessees are extremely concerned about the safety hazards their cars pose.

Others are frustrated by GM’s suggestions. They say that monitoring the car while it is charging for hours or parking far away from fire hazards is unreasonable and makes their vehicles unusable.

“My wife and I were awakened by a loud bang originating from outside the house. I investigated and noted a police officer outside my home using a fire extinguisher on my 2019 Chevy Bolt. I saw flames coming from the right passenger side… The fire spread to the house. At some point the Fire Department arrived and extinguished the fire, but not before the car was completely consumed and significant damage was done to our home.”

– Chevy Bolt Owner

“GM has a final remedy that involves analyzing the battery for defective modules and installing advanced diagnostic software to detect performance issues before they cause a problem. The huge problem with that remedy is that there have been two fires in cars that had their batteries analyzed and had the diagnostic software installed. That means their system for detecting and preventing fires DOES NOT WORK.”

– Chevy Bolt Owner

“Even when it is not charging, the Bolt is still very close to my garage, main bedroom, and house. In addition, I live near the mountains in the foothills. It is a high fire danger area. If something happened to the Bolt, it could cause a lot of damage to my neighbors and the surrounding area.”

– Chevy Bolt Owner

“We were alerted that the Bolt was on fire. We discovered smoke billowing out of the rear of the Bolt and the Bolt apparently combusting from within, in the battery cells. The Fire Department was contacted and took approximately 3 hours to control the fire and smoke. The Fire Department evacuated us, our downstairs neighbors, and both units of the home next door during the fire.”

– Chevy Bolt Owner

Contact the Chevy Lemon Law Experts Today

GM’s solutions to the battery problem are insufficient and burdensome. Chevy Bolt drivers purchased vehicles that they thought were safe and convenient to drive, only to be told that they are prone to battery fires and cannot utilize the full mileage that was advertised.

Additionally, Bolt owners nationwide are having difficulty attaining replacement parts for their cars. GM does not appear to be in any rush to address these issues, despite the apparent safety risk. If you have had little luck with your Chevy Bolt or any other GM vehicle, contact us for a quick and confidential assessment. We understand that going up against a large auto manufacturer can be daunting, and we are here to help you throughout this process.

The Lemon Law Experts will begin by evaluating your case and determining if you qualify for cash compensation, a refund, or a replacement vehicle. We believe that you deserve to drive a vehicle that you can feel safe in, and our lemon law firm will do everything we can to make that happen. The automakers and their attorneys know the hard work and exceptional level of detail we put into every case.

Contact us online or call (877) 885-5366 today.

Ford F 250 Death Wobble Recall Overview

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Over the past 15 years, thousands of drivers have experienced chronic suspension and steering problems in their “Ford Tough” pickup trucks. This manufacturing defect is widely known as the “Ford Super Duty death wobble.”

Affected vehicles can shudder or shake aggressively at highway speeds or after hitting rough pavement. The Ford death wobble can impact thousands of popular heavy-duty pickup trucks manufactured by Ford between 2005-2019.

How do I know if My Ford is affected?

Your pickup may be one of thousands of popular Ford trucks affected by the Death Wobble. This defect can cause excessive shaking when the car hits a bump or other imperfection in the road while driving.

The steering wheel may rattle so excessively that the vehicle may be difficult to control or steer. Some drivers report that the shaking is so severe, it can feel like you have been hit by another car. This violent shaking usually occurs when driving at speeds over 50 miles per hour. To stop the shaking, drivers are often forced to slow down or stop their cars immediately.

The Ford death wobble defect may be caused by premature wear or loosening of various components such as the ball joints, control arms, track bar bashing, damper bracket, or shocks. Unfortunately, fixing the problem involves trial and error. Service providers often have trouble figuring out which steering part is the source of the death wobble, as the problem can affect any part of the steering.

What makes and models are affected?

Ford F-Series Super Duty models such as the Ford F-250 or Ford F-350 from model years 2005-2019, may have the death wobble problem. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has received over 1,200 complaints mentioning the death wobble from Ford drivers with vehicles as old as 2005. Multiple lawsuits accuse Ford of knowing about the problem for at least 15 years.

How to Fix the Ford F250 Death Wobble

To address the “Death Wobble” in Ford F250 trucks, a newly redesigned steering linkage damper is now available for repairs. This addresses instances where vehicles exhibit sustained steering oscillation, which persists even after encountering rough pavement or expansion joints at speeds typically exceeding 45 mph (72 km/h).

This program is a one-time repair for the steering linkage damper, applicable for 10 years or 150,000 miles from the warranty start date, whichever comes first. For those whose vehicles have surpassed these limits, fret not; the program extends until December 31, 2024. This coverage also transfers to subsequent owners. You will need to provide your vehicle’s VIN (Vehicle Identification Number), which you can find near your name at the start of your notification letter, to schedule a service appointment under Customer Satisfaction Program 20N04.

Is There a Buyback Program?

There is no Ford death wobble buy back nor a Ford super duty death wobble recall. Despite numerous complaints for consumers, Ford has yet to issue any sort of official death wobble recall.

In December 2020, the auto manufacturer offered extended warranties and free repairs for the steering wheel oscillation issue. Ford lessees and owners have reported however, that Ford is only offering to fix the steering dampers on 2017-2019 pickup trucks.

Across online forums, several Ford customers have reported that the steering fixes that Ford does offer do not solve the problem permanently. Some drivers say that the shaking problem can often reappear mere months after repairs completed by Ford.

Others claim that the manufacturer has not honored their warranties. Ford dealers have told multiple drivers that their steering and suspension issues were the result of them not properly maintaining their vehicles.

Is There a Lawsuit?

Multiple class action lawsuits have been filed against Ford Motor Company over the death wobble problem. The latest Ford F250 death wobble lawsuit was filed in 2019. This suit includes F-250 and F-350 Ford model years 2005-2019. Plaintiffs accuse Ford of knowingly selling pickup trucks with suspension and steering defects.

Should I join the lawsuit?

You may still be able to join one of the ongoing Ford super duty death wobble lawsuits, however, filing an individual claim may be a better option. Keep in mind that if you wish to pursue an individual lemon law claim, you will have to opt-out of any lawsuits that your vehicle may be included in, before the deadline.

In a successful class action case, you may have to split the final settlement with potentially thousands of people. Your cut may be significantly less than the total amount of money you have spent on your car.

Through an individual claim, you could qualify for cash, a replacement truck, or a refund that would reimburse you for all the money you have spent on your defective car. This is a much better option if you have spent thousands of dollars paying out of pocket for repairs or if you have taken in your pickup to an authorized repair shop for multiple steering-related repairs.

What are my options?

The Ford F 250 death wobble is affecting many Ford truck owners and you may be able to file an individual lawsuit or claim. To file an individual claim, we highly recommend that you work with an experienced lemon law attorney who can help you build the strongest case possible against the manufacturer, as well as maximize your settlement.

Large automakers like Ford spend quite a bit of money to work with highly skilled lemon law attorneys who exclusively specialize in this field of law. Going at this on your own can be incredibly challenging, which is why we recommend that you discuss your case with a reputable lemon law attorney in your area.

If you live in California and are experiencing steering or other problems with your pickup, our team can help you. The Lemon Law Experts have assisted millions of consumers across the state in recovering millions of dollars for their individual claims, for cases just like yours.

Our team regularly wins cases for drivers going up against large auto manufacturers like Ford Motor Company. Not sure if your case qualifies? No problem, our team can review your situation to see what your recovery could look like. Our case analysis comes at no cost or obligation to you.

The Lemon Law Experts do not get paid unless you win your case against Ford or any other auto manufacturer, so you do not have to worry about retainer fees or other upfront costs when you hire us.

In fact, the manufacturer is required to cover your legal fees if you win. You can be confident that our lemon law attorneys will work diligently to give you an excellent outcome in your case. Get started today by giving us a call at 877-885-5366, or by filling out an online form on our website.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Tesla Inc. has announced a recall for its 2024 Tesla Cybertruck due to reports of unintended acceleration. The problem is caused by a defective pedal pad that has the potential to become stuck, keeping the accelerator depressed and increasing the chance of a collision. Accelerating too quickly could push the accelerator pad out of place and entangle it in the surrounding trim.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has received documents indicating that 3,878 vehicles are included in the recall. This is astonishingly all the Cybertruck production for 2024–from November 13, 2023, through April 4, 2024.

Tesla Cybertruck Recall Information	Details
Total Vehicles Recalled	3,878 potentially involved vehicles
Description of Noncompliance	When considerable force is applied to the accelerator pedal pad, it may detach, causing the pedal to become trapped in the interior trim above the pedal in affected automobiles.
Tesla Motors, Inc. Contact Number	1-650-681-5000
NHTSA Recall Number	24V-276
Manufacturer Recall Number	SB-24-33-003
Owner Notification Letters	June 18, 2024

What’s Wrong with the Cybertruck brake pedal?

Applying excessive force to the accelerator pedal’s cover can cause it to detach, potentially becoming trapped in the driver’s footwell trim. This could result in the accelerator staying depressed, leading to continued acceleration.

However, pressing the brake pedal in such a scenario immediately cuts drive torque to the wheels, even if both pedals are pressed simultaneously. According to NHTSA, the vehicle decelerates at the same rate as it would if only the brake were applied.

Tesla became aware of this issue after a customer complaint on March 31, 2024. On April 2, Tesla verified that the brake system functioned correctly during the incident, successfully bringing the vehicle to a halt with both pedals pressed. Subsequently, after internal testing, Tesla issued a voluntary recall of the Cybertruck on April 12. As of April 15, Tesla reported no accidents or injuries related to this issue.

Here’s What’s Included in the Tesla Cybertruck Brake Pedal Recall

The recall includes all 3,878 units of the distinctive angular trucks that have been sold to date. NHTSA states that the defect affects 100% of recalled vehicles.

Unlike some Tesla recalls that involve software updates delivered remotely, this issue necessitates a physical repair. To address the problem, Tesla will replace or modify the accelerator pedal assembly and cover, ensuring the pad remains secure in the future. Documents filed with the NHTSA indicate that by April 17, production of the Cybertruck had been modified to incorporate a new accelerator pedal design.

Additionally, according to NHTSA records, vehicles awaiting delivery and those in transit to customers will undergo the necessary fix before reaching their intended recipients. This aligns with reports from the Wall Street Journal, which noted a temporary suspension of Cybertruck deliveries by Tesla. The duration of this delay is unclear.

Here’s What’s NOT Included in the Tesla Cybertruck Brake Pedal Recall

NHTSA’s recall includes nearly 4,000 Cybertruck vehicles produced between November 13, 2023, and April 4, 2024–any other Tesla model is excluded from this recall. To determine if your vehicle is affected, owners can use the NHTSA VIN Recall search or the Tesla VIN Recall tools.

To schedule a service appointment for the recall repair, owners can use the Tesla app. By navigating to ‘Service’ > ‘Request Service’ > ‘Other’ > ‘Something Else’ and entering the note “Open Recall Repair – Cybertruck Accelerator Pedal Pad” into the ‘Describe Concern’ field, owners can facilitate the process.

Is there a Tesla Cybertruck Recall Fix?

During a Cybertruck event dubbed “Cybertakeover” in California, hosted by the Tesla Owners Club of Santa Clarita Valley, a user shared a video on X (formerly Twitter) showcasing a possible resolution of the pedal issue. Dubbed the “35-second recall fix,” the footage depicts a worker addressing the problem by drilling a hole into the gas pedal and securing the pad with a rivet.

While the full details of the repair aren’t yet available, the manufacturer noted that they will replace or modify the accelerator pedal assembly to meet requirements and ensure proper pad retention to prevent dislodging.

Contact an Expert in California Lemon Law

Tesla Inc. has dealt with a series of recalls over the past year. Earlier in February, over two million vehicles were recalled due to warnings lights panel font size issues. In December, a similar number of vehicles underwent a recall to enhance the Autopilot software.

As Tesla contends with increased competition and a deceleration in demand for electric vehicles, it faces challenges in sustaining its prior growth trajectory. While the Cybertruck, launched in response to this shifting landscape, represents Tesla’s first new model since 2020, its unconventional design, premium price point, and numerous recalls, may limit both its market appeal and sales.

If your Cybertruck is among those recalled for accelerator issues, we recommend reviewing your legal options. Depending on your circumstances, you may qualify for compensation, including refunds, replacement vehicles, or monetary reimbursement. Notably, as the prevailing party, the defendant bears responsibility for your attorney fees and costs, ensuring representation at no out-of-pocket expense to you.

For those who purchased or leased their vehicles in California, the Lemon Law Experts are ready to help. With extensive experience handling lemon law cases statewide, our dedicated team possesses the expertise and resources needed to effectively advocate for your Tesla lemon law rights.

Regardless of the manufacturer or specific issue involved, you can rely on the Lemon Law Experts to offer comprehensive support in pursuing the compensation and resolution you deserve. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you get rid of that Tesla Cybertruck or other lemon vehicle.

Legally reviewed by: Jessica Anvar Stotz, JD, MBA

Kia America has initiated a recall impacting all 2020-2023 Telluride SUVs and certain 2024 models due to potential concerns regarding rollaway incidents during parking.

This recall encompasses a substantial number of vehicles, totaling 427,407 units. The rollaway problem is the result of an assembly error, specifically linked to the incomplete engagement of two critical drivetrain components—the intermediate shaft and right front driveshaft.

This oversight could cause the splines of the intermediate shaft to wear out faster than they should, which could cause the vehicle to move while it is in Park.

Kia tells drivers that until the needed recall repair is done at an authorized dealership, they should manually engage the parking brake every time they park their car.

Recall Information	Details
Total Vehicles Recalled	427,407 potentially involved vehicles
Description of Noncompliance	It’s possible that the supplier didn’t properly assemble the intermediate shaft and right front driveshaft, so they might not be fully engaged. Partial engagement can damage the intermediate shaft splines over time, resulting in inadvertent vehicle movement when the parking brake is not applied.
Kia America Inc. Contact Number	1- 800-333-4542
NHTSA Recall Number	24V-214
Manufacturer Recall Number	SC303
Owner Notification Letters	May 17, 2024

There have been no reports of accidents or injuries related to the recall. In correspondence with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Kia says that they were told of 16 cases of vehicles moving without being meant to.

Kia says that 10 of these reports were sent in as warranty claims. In six of these cases, Kia also confirmed that the spline damage or wear was related to the recall problem.

Here’s What’s Included in the Recall

The Kia Telluride Rollaway recall affects all Telluride models from 2020 to 2023 and some vehicles from 2024. Affected Kia Telluride SUVs were made from January 9, 2019, to October 19, 2023.

Here’s What’s not Included in the Recall

According to NHTSA documents, 2024 Tellurides manufactured after October 20, 2023, are exempt from the recall. This exemption is due to the supplier implementing an additional computer vision process to ensure full engagement of the driveshaft assembly.

What is the fix for the Telluride Rollaway issue?

Kia dealerships will address the issue through a two-step process. First, they will update the software so that the parking brake is always on when certain conditions are met, like when the shifter is in Park and the engine is off, or when the driver’s door opens no matter what gear the car is in.

Then, if deemed necessary, dealerships will replace the intermediate shaft, free of charge. All repair procedures related to this recall will be provided free of charge. Notification letters will be dispatched to affected owners by May 17, 2024, with detailed instructions on how to make an appointment for recall repairs.

If you are encountering repeated issues with your Kia’s drivetrain or other vehicle system, it may be worth exploring if your case qualifies for a lemon law claim.

Plenty of people who have purchased or leased Kia lemons have successfully pursued claims for issues far less severe than potential safety concerns associated with unintended vehicle movement.

Successful lemon law claims can result in cash compensation, replacement vehicles, or a lemon law refund. Talk to a consumer protection or lemon law legal professional in your state to learn more about your possible options for justice and recovery.

Get Help from the Lemon Law Experts

If you suspect that you have a claim against Kia under the lemon law, you may be qualify for compensation, such as a refund, replacement vehicle or cash compensation. As the prevailing party, the defendant manufacturer is responsible to pay for your attorneys fees and costs. Please note that prompt action is crucial, especially considering the potential dangers associated with the Kia Telluride recall.

If you have purchased or leased a defective Kia in California, our team at the Lemon Law Experts may be able to assist you.

As a top lemon law firm in California, the Lemon Law Experts hold years of experience recovering millions of dollars in refunds and cash compensation for consumers across the State of California.

To make sure you get the recovery that you are due, our team of Lemon Law Experts are committed to guiding you through every step of the legal process against Kia or another vehicle manufacturer. The best part? We only get paid if you win your case. Contact the Lemon Law Experts now to get our assistance in pursuing compensation and justice for your defective Kia Telluride.